The Flight of (the) Concord: Joan Copjec and Slavoj Žižek read ‘Irma’s Injection’
Abstract
In this article, I return to the ‘over-interpreted anxiety dream’ (Copjec, 2015) of ‘Irma’s Injection’ to make a wider claim concerning an unacknowledged investment in structure that I understand to return to Žižekian appeals to the disruptive structure of the Real. I begin with the analysis of Freud’s first specimen dream, and Lacan’s response to this, offered by Joan Copjec, Žižek’s fellow traveller in theory. My concern is with Copjec’s staging of the encounter with the Real, both in its imaginary and symbolic modes, and the extent to which a renewed focus on the narrational frames of psychoanalytic accounts of ‘Irma’s Injection’ can help bring to light their otherwise neglected appeals to structure.. Rather than a simple deconstructive evasion of the Real, I argue that such a move enables a questioning the location of the limit within Copjec’s account of ‘Irma’s Injection’: a return of the Real to the Real.
.
This discussion results also in a more straightforward reassessment of the understanding of structure in ‘Irma’s Injection’ as read by both Copjec and Žižek. I focus on one particular aspect, ‘flight’, understood to be: central to the structure of the dream; disruptive to this structure; a remaining and an escape; evasion and fidelity. Through the frame of ‘flight’, I re-evaluate the dream within/ across the work of Žižek and Copjec before, finally, contemplating how ‘flight’ might help to refigure the relationship between the two theorists, and the deconstructive practice that both question within their various responses to ‘Irma’s Injection.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hurst, A. (2008) Derrida Vis-a-vis Lacan: Interweaving Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis (Perspectives in Continental Philosophy), New York: Fordham University Press.
Cocks, N. (2020) “Gender, Genre and Dracula: Joan Copjec and ‘Vampire Fiction’”, Humanities 9/2.
Copjec, J. (2005/1994) Read My Desire: Lacan Against the Historicists, London: Verso.
Derrida, J. (1998/1996) Resistances of Psychoanalysis, trans. by P. Kamuf, P. Brault, and M. Naas. Stanford; Stanford University Press.
Flisfeder, M. (2012) The Symbolic, The Sublime, and Slavoj Žižek’s Theory of Film. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Freud, S. (2001/1900) The Interpretation of Dreams, trans. James Stratchey, London: Vintage.
Johnson, B. (1988/1977) “The Frame of Reference,” in J. P. Muller and W. J. Richardson (eds.) The Purloined Poe: Lacan, Derrida, and Psychoanalytic Reading, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Lacan, J. (1988/1978) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954 – 55, trans. by S. Tomaselli, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_____ (1978) Le Séminaire, liv. II: Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse, Paris: Seuil.
E. Laclau and C. Mouffe (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London: Verso (New Left).
Mahony, P. (2001) Psychoanalysis and Discourse, London: Routledge.
Sigler, D. (2010) “The Navel of the Dream: Freud, Derrida and Lacan on the Gap where ‘Something Happens,” SubStance 39/2:17-38
Žižek, S. (2013) Less than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow if Dialectical Materialism, London: Verso.
____ (2011/2001) Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism?: Four Interventions in the (Mis)Use of a Notion, London: Verso.
_____ (2008) Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. London: Profile Books.
_____ (2009b/1997) Plague of Fantasies, London: Verso.
_____ (2009c/1997) The Tiklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.
_____ (2008b/1992) Enjoy Your Symptom! London: Verso.
_____ (2006) “Freud Lives!,” London Review of Books 28/10.
_____ (1996) “From Virtual Reality to the Virtualisation of Reality,” in T. Druckery (ed.) Electronic Culture: Technology and Visual Representation, New York: Aperture.
Žižek, S. and J. Milbank (2009) The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic?, Cambridge: Massachusetts.
E. P. Ziarek (1997) “From Euthanasia to the Other of Reason: Performativity and the Deconstruction of Sexual Difference,” in E. K. Feder, M. C. Rawlinson, E. Zakin (eds.) Derrida and Feminism: Recasting the Question of Women, London: Routledge.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Neil Cocks
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
IJŽS - 2007 & 2016