Trashed Future: Waste Objects and Identity Politics in Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood
Abstract
This essay analyzes the eco-religious “God’s Gardeners” group as they appear in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood as a possible model of capitalist “non-existence,” exploring the alternative potentials at which they arrive in relation to waste throughout the text. The Gardeners present an affective mode of consumer non-participation as a possible first step toward a reflexive awareness of the role trash plays in our subjective experiences of the world. Through a process of symbolic embodiment, the Gardeners exist in marginalized space and so re-situate waste for themselves as objects and spaces with new potential boundaries. This leads to a confrontation with social reality itself, piercing the reality-building project of capitalist logic in order to uncover the fabricated “antagonism between the Excluded—the ‘animals’ according to global capital—and the Included—the ‘political animals’ proper, those participating in capitalism” that structures characters’ experiences (Žižek 2008: 44). The focus here is not only on re-situating waste but re-inscribing it in the domain of social discourse in a way that subverts consumer expectations and challenges the limits of desire. In these texts, enjoyment is displaced onto waste objects as a point of psychological investment transmitted from subject to subject. In building reality through these kinds of direct relations, Atwood implies, one may challenge the imposition of ideology and expand its apparent limits in order to re-symbolize the spaces and objects marginalized as waste, proceeding in the end to a renewed interconnection between subject, object, and excess.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atwood, Margaret. (2003) Oryx and Crake, Toronto: Vintage Canada.
---. (2009) The Year of the Flood, Toronto: Vintage Canada.
Bahrawi, Nazry. (2013) “Hope of a Hopeless World: Eco-Teleology in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood,” Green Letters, 17.3: 251-263.
Bergthaller, Hannes. (2010) “Housebreaking the Human Animal: Humanism and the Problem of Sustainability in Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood,” English Studies, 91: 728-43.
Bouson, J. Brooks. (2011) “‘We’re Using Up the Earth. It’s Almost Gone’: A Return to the Post-Apocalyptic Future in Margaret Atwood’s The Year of the Flood,” The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 46: 9–26.
Canavan, Gerry. (2012) “Hope, But Not for Us: Ecological Science Fiction and the End of the World in Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood,” Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory, 23.2: 138-59.
Ciobanu, Calina. (2014) “Rewriting the Human at the End of the Anthropocene in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy,” Minnesota Review, 83: 153-62.
Kristeva, Julia. (1984) Revolution in Poetic Language, translated by Leon S. Roudiez, New York: Columbia.
Lacan, Jacques. (2018) …or Worse: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book XIX, translated by A.R. Price, edited by Jacques-Alain Miller, Cambridge: Polity.
Miller, Jacques-Alain. (1977) “Suture (Elements of the Logic of the Signifier),” Screen, 18.4: 24-34.
Morton, Timothy. (2009) Ecology without Nature, Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Žižek, Slavoj. (2008) “Nature and its Discontents,” SubStance, 37.3: 37-72.
---. (2012) Living in the End Times, New York: Verso.
Zupančič, Alenka. (2017) What Is Sex?, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Shane Dennis Radke
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
IJŽS - 2007 & 2016