What would Greta do? Anthropocene politics and the reclamation of universal Earth justice
Abstract
Justice talk has come under criticism lately, facing trenchant refutations from decolonial activists, environmentalists, feminists, and indigenous voices. Yet, the need to develop universalist frames for building solidarity, combating violence, and repairing and restoring deteriorating Earth systems has never been more urgent. This paper seeks answers in the clarity of the voices of the worldwide youth climate justice movement (YCJM), which eschews arid abstractions around justice and instead situates universalist political aspirations in the material urgency of the climate crisis. By identifying vital driving features of its assemblage in the power of interlocking elite networks of transnational mega-corporations and their supportive political routines and extractive regimes, the YCJM reminds us that it is no longer possible for these structures, first identified by Marx, to be hidden in the fog of philosophical charges of “onto-theology.” The Earth system catastrophe is a shared reality whose ethical demand is without doubt; it is no longer a choice between acting responsibly and remaining committed to one’s egotistical “life goals.” The search for authenticity, therefore, is in question; in its place, an ethic of universal responsibility has become inevitable.
The YCJM cuts through the fragmented particularities of identity politics today and proposes strategies parallel to those of the divestment and Black Lives Matter movements. By directly confronting the inner circle’s capture of the world’s resources, its extractive methods, and cynical use of ‘universal justice’ frames under the cover of professional political philosophy, the climate justice alliance is pointing to far-reaching consequences entangled with the material effects of climate change. The networked coordination of the protagonists reproduces (capitalist) conditions of life and generates institutional path dependencies causing intersectional harms over the long haul. What needs special attention is the continual expression of these corruption syndromes in apparently stable cultural forms, along with practical trajectories for counterhegemonic strategy potentially guided by the movement.
In this paper, I draw on Slavoj Žižek’s prodigious use of Lacanian psychoanalysis and Marxist political theory to develop a rough-cut strategic assessment of the YCJM’s chances for success. My aim is to explore whether the tragedy of the Anthropocene might find its redemptive power in the psychoanalytical rupture of children from adult entanglements in capitalist ideology.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Althusser, Louis. 1994. The Future Lasts Forever. The New Press. https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/louis-althusser/the-future-lasts-forever/ (June 27, 2024).
Althusser, Louis. 2014. On The Reproduction Of Capitalism: Ideology And Ideological State Apparatuses. Verso Books.
Bloch, Ernst. 1995. The Principle of Hope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262521994/the-principle-of-hope/ (August 22, 2024).
Brown, Wendy. 2009. Edgework Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400826872.
Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. 2012. “The Precautionary Principle and Enlightened Doomsaying.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale (4): 577–92.
Ehrenreich, Ben. 2019. “The Passion of Greta Thunberg.” The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/156101/passion-greta-thunberg (August 21, 2024).
Elias, Norbert. 2006. The Court Society. University College Dublin Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/C/bo58743824.html (April 12, 2023).
Faulkner, Joanne. 2011. “Innocents and Oracles: The Child as a Figure of Knowledge and Critique in the Middle-Class Philosophical Imagination.” Critical Horizons 12(3): 323–46. doi:10.1558/crit.v12i3.323.
Fredericks, Rosalind. 2014. “‘The Old Man is Dead’: Hip Hop and the Arts of Citizenship of Senegalese Youth.” Antipode 46(1): 130–48. doi:10.1111/anti.12036.
Hornsey, Matthew, and Stephan Lewandowsky. 2022. “A Toolkit for Understanding and Addressing Climate Scepticism.” Nature Human Behaviour (6): 1454–64.
Johnston, Adrian. 2008. Zizek’s Ontology. Northwestern University Press. https://nupress.northwestern.edu/9780810124561/zizeks-ontology/ (August 18, 2024).
Kantorowicz, Ernst. 2016. The King’s Two Bodies | Princeton University Press. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691169231/the-kings-two-bodies (July 2, 2024).
Kuldova, Tereza. 2019. “Fetishism and the Problem of Disavowal.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 22(5): 766–80. doi:10.1108/QMR-12-2016-0125.
Kunkle, Sheila. 2015. “The Act.” In The Žizek Dictionary, Routledge.
McGowan, Todd. 2022. The Racist Fantasy: Unconscious Roots of Hatred. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
de Moor, Joost, Katrin Uba, Mattias Wahlström, Magnus Wennerhag, and
Michiel De Vydt. 2020. Protest for a Future II : Composition, Mobilization and Motives of the Participants in Fridays For Future Climate Protests on 20-27 September, 2019, in 19 Cities around the World. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-40271 (August 16, 2024).
Piketty, Thomas. 2020. Capital and Ideology — Harvard University Press. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674980822 (July 2, 2024).
Rajan, Sudhir Chella. 2010. “Parental Sacrifice as Atonement for Future Climate Change.” In The Environmental Politics of Sacrifice, eds. Michael
Maniates and John M. Meyer. The MIT Press, 165–84. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhfg4.13 (September 5, 2022).
Rajan, Sudhir Chella. 2020. A Social Theory of Corruption. Harvard University Press.
Thunberg, Greta. 2019. No One Is Too Small to Make a Difference. UK: Penguin. https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/No_One_is_Too_Small_to_Make_a_Difference/-UsXxQEACAAJ?hl=en (August 28, 2024).
Unger, Roberto. 1984. False Necessity.
United Nations. 2019. “Greta Thunberg Tells World Leaders ‘You Are Failing Us’, as Nations Announce Fresh Climate Action | United Nations For Youth.” https://www.un.org/development/desa/youth/news/2019/09/greta-thunberg/ (June 27, 2024).
Virilio, Paul. 2006. Speed and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9781584350408/speed-and-politics/ (June 28, 2024).
Zeiher, Cindy. 2014. “Other/Big Other.” In The Žižek Dictionary Ed., Rex Butler, UK: Routledge.
Žižek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2006. The Parallax View. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262512688/the-parallax-view/ (July 8, 2024).
Žižek, Slavoj. 2007. How to Read Lacan. Norton. https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393329551 (July 2, 2024).
Źižek, Slavoj. 2008. In Defence of Lost Causes. London: Verso.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2008. “Nature and Its Discontents.” SubStance 37(3): 37–72.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2012. “The Real of Sexual Difference.” In Reading Seminar XX: Lacan’s Major Work on Love, Knowledge, and Feminine Sexuality, eds. Suzanne Barnard and Bruce Fink. SUNY Press, 57–75. doi:10.1515/9780791488263-004.
Źižek, Slavoj. 2013. Less Than Nothing. Verso Books.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2020. PANDEMIC! OR Books. https://orbooks.com/catalog/pandemic/ (August 9, 2024).
Žižek, Slavoj, and Glyn Daly. 2004. Conversations with Žižek. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sudhir Chella Rajan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
IJŽS - 2007 & 2016