Žižek, Antagonism and the Syrian Crisis
Abstract
As an outspoken public intellectual Slavoj Žižek’s comments on today’s refugee crisis, particularly in relation to Syria, have been widely criticized. The following essay looks at the philosophy and politics of Žižek in relation to theorists such as Ranciere, Laclau and Mouffe in order to explore where Žižek’s dismissal of migrant struggle highlights the failure of his Lacan inspired Kantian transcendentalism and State based class politics to explore the political and subversive potentials of alternative sites of struggle. While Žižek’s exploration of antagonism as a site of politics remains useful, his vision of State politics and class struggle as the bearers of anti- or alter-capitalist struggle, based on a Universalist politics and transcendental subject, fails to consider the multifarious political aspects of global mobility.
Keywords
Full Text:
EnglishReferences
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford University Press
Arendt, H., (1968). Origins of Totalitarianism, London: Harcourt.
Badiou, A. (2006). Being and Event, New York: Continuum Press.
Badiou, A. (2008). “The Communist Hypothesis,” New Left Review, 49: 29-42.
Bjelić, D. (2011). Normalizing the Balkans, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2000). “Structure, History and the Political,” in
Butler, J, E. Laclau, and S. Žižek (eds) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality, London: Verso.
Mouffe, C. (1995). “Post-Marxism: democracy and identity" Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13(3): 259–265.
Ranciere, J. (1998). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ranciere, J. (2004). “Who Is the Subject of the Rights of Man?” South Atlantic Quarterly, 103: 297-310
Sharpe, M. 2004. Slavoj Žižek: A Little Piece of the Real, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Žižek, S. (2016a). Stranger Danger: To Resolve the Migrant Crisis We Must Recognize the Stranger Within Ourselves. In These Times. Available at: http://inthesetimes.com/article/18991/stranger-danger-to-resolve-the-migrant-crisis-we-must-recognize-the-strange. Accessed May 2016.
Žižek, S. (2016b). The Need to Traverse the Fantasy. In These Times. Available at: http://inthesetimes.com/article/18722/Slavoj-Žižek-on-Syria-refugees-Eurocentrism-Western-Values-Lacan-Islam. Accessed May 2016.
Žižek, S. (2015a). In the Wake of Paris Attacks the Left Must Embrace Its Radical Western Roots. In These Times. Available at: http://inthesetimes.com/article/18605/breaking-the-taboos-in-the-wake-of-paris-attacks-the-left-must-embrace-its. Accessed May 2016.
Žižek, S. (2015b). Is Hegel Dead—Or Are We Dead in the Eyes of Hegel? A Hegelian View of the Present Age. [Youtube]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVa4ERqz97o. Accessed May 2016.
Žižek, S. (2009a). “How to Being from the Beginning,” New Left Review, 57: 43-55.
Žižek, S. (2009b). First as Tragedy, Then as Farce, London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2008). In Defense of Lost Causes, London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (1999). The Ticklish Subject, London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology, London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2006). How to Read Lacan, London: Granta Books.
Žižek, S. (2010). Living in End Times, London: Verso.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Jacob P Chamberlain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
IJŽS - 2007 & 2016