The Promise of Ideo-logic, the Psycho-Epistemic Organization of Socio-Symbolic Systems
Abstract
The aim of this work is to develop a comparative analysis of the discursive structures that underlie the socialized formation of the interpretative paradigms of reality. We analyse how both political ideologies and the so-called “conspiracy theories” can be understood starting from the structure and functioning of Marc Augè's ideo-logic, namely the systemic-discursive device that defines the field of all possible sentences defining the real.
Keywords
References
Augé, M. (2003). Poteri di vita, poteri di morte: introduzione a un'antropologia della repressione. Cortina.
Bion, W. R. (1994). Learning from experience. Jason Aronson.
Bion, W. R. (1962). A theory of thinking. Parent-infant psychodynamics: wild things, mirrors and ghosts, 74-82.
Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., & De Zavala, A. G. (2016). Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem, and the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616170
Crosato, C. (2017). Sul dispositivo, fra Foucault e Agamben. Philosophical readings, 9.3.
Darwin, H., Neave, N., & Holmes, J. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1289-1293 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027
Foucault, M. (2014). L'ordine del discorso. Giulio Einaudi Editore.
Freud, S., Totem and Taboo, Routledge, 2001.
Fromm, E., The Dogma of Christ, Owl Books, 2001.
Goreis, A., & Voracek, M. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 205 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 30-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.023
Hafsi, M., (2011), The container, contained and in-between: A review of the containment concept and its vicissitudes. Annual Report of the Graduate School of Nara University, n.16.
Hjelmslev, L. (1969). Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. University of Wisconsin Press.
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 35-56 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PloS one, 9(2), e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti‐vaccine conspiracy theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(8), 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12453
Lacan, J. (2011). The seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book VI: Desire and its interpretation: 1958-1959.
Lacan, J. (2015). The ethics of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book VII.
Madisson, M. L. (2014). The semiotic logic of signification of conspiracy theories. Semiotica, 2014(202), 273-300.
Pasek, Josh, Tobias H. Stark, Jon A. Krosnick, and Trevor Tompson. "What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-Black attitudes." Electoral Studies 40 (2015): 482-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.009
Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real‐world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 443-463 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x
Swami, V., Furnham, A., Smyth, N., Weis, L., Lay, A., & Clow, A. (2016). Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 72-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.084
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3), 572-585 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202-227 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x
Todorov, T. (1999). The conquest of America: The question of the other. University of Oklahoma Press.
van Prooijen, J. W. (2017). Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Applied cognitive psychology, 31(1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3301
Winnicott, D. W. (2001). L’uso di un oggetto e l’entrare in rapporto attraverso identificazioni, 1968. Gioco e Realtà. Armando Editore.
Žižek, S. The ticklish subject. The Absent Center of Political Ontology, Verso, 2000.
Refbacks
Copyright (c) 2024 Piercosma Bisconti, Valeria Cesaroni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
IJŽS - 2007 & 2016