Getting serious with finiteness

Nico Graack

Abstract


Žižeks work on Heidegger has not been examined in the same way as his work on Hegel, Lacan, Marx and Kant. In order to shed light on his political thought – oscillating between a heroic Leninism and a subversive Ideologiekritik – we are reconstructing his critique of Heidegger as it follows from the first chapter of The Ticklish Subject. In that we want to show how his critique is essentially Kantian – Which means for Žižek: A critique that doesn’t retreat from the full consequences of the subject’s finiteness. That is excactly what Žižek traces in both Heidegger and Kant, focussing around the role of transcendental imagination. In a last step we are showing how his doubled political position follows from this and hint at the intuition that his heroic Leninism itself could be conceived as a sort of retreat from those very consequences.


Keywords


Žižek, Heidegger, Kant; Finiteness; Subject; Imagination; Lenin

Full Text:

PDF

References


The years in brackets indicate the year of the first edition. The years in brackets correspond to those used for citation in the text. All translations from German to English – if not used in quotes by others – are my own.

With abbreviation:

- Heidegger, Martin (1929): Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. In: Heidegger, Martin: Gesamtausgabe, 1. Abteilung, Band 3. Klostermann, Frankfurt a.M., 1991 (KM).

- Kant, Immanuel (1788): Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Meiner, Hamburg, 2003 (KpV, using the usual citation with pagination of the Academy edition).

- Kant, Immanuel (1781): Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Meiner, Hamburg, 1998 (KrV, using the usual citation with pagination of the A and/or B edition).

- Žižek, Slavoj (1999): The Ticklish Subject. Verso, London/New York, 1999 (TS).

Without abbreviation:

- de Beistegui, Miguel (2007): "Another Step, Another Direction: A Response to Žižek's 'Why Heidegger Made The Right Step in 1933'". In: International Journal of Žižek Studies, 1 (4), 2007. Online: http://zizekstudies.org/index.php/IJZS/article/view/67/64

- Brockelman, Thomas (2008): Žižek and Heidegger. The Question Concerning Techno-Capitalism. Continuum, London/New York, 2008.

- Montero, Felipe D. (2021): "Autochthony and Rootlessness: towards a Hegelian reappropriation of Heidegger's philosophy". In: International Journal of Žižek Studies, 15 (2), 2021. Online: http://zizekstudies.org/index.php/IJZS/article/view/1201

- Sharpe, Matthew (2008): "Žižek's Kant, or The Crack in the Universal (Politicising the Transcendental Turn)". In: International Journal of Žižek Studies, 2 (2), 2008. Online: http://zizekstudies.org/index.php/IJZS/article/view/100/100

- Woodson, Hue (2020): "'Right Step (Albeit in the Wrong Direction)': Žižek on Heidegger's Nazism and the Domestication of Nietzsche'. In: International Journal of Žižek Studies, 14 (1), 2020. Online: http://zizekstudies.org/index.php/IJZS/article/view/1147/1178

- Žižek, Slavoj (2020): "How to watch the news, episode 4" on Russia Today.

- Žižek, Slavoj (2017): Incontinence of the Void – Economico-Philosophical Spandrels. MIT Press, Cambridge/London, 2017.

- Žižek, Slavoj (1993): Tarrying with the Negative – Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Duke University Press, Dunham, 1993.

- Žižek, Slavoj (2015): "Why Heidegger should not be criminalised". In: The New Statesman, 13.05.2015. Online: https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2015/05/slavoj-zizek-why-heidegger-should-not-be-criminalised


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Nico Graack

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

IJŽS - 2007 & 2016