Re-thinking Pornography: Sontag’s retrieval of a post-religious Hegel

Xabier Insausti

Abstract


When Susan Sontag addresses the problem of pornography and relates it to Hegel, she is not merely describing a path in European philosophy aimed to construct a new language, but she is also committing this aim to the importance of re-reading culture. The fashion in which pornography describes reality is meaningful when we are trying to approach Hegel in his aim to construct a post-religious language that finally will make ready-to-hand life as life. Politics, and society, being two essential elements to understand reality, become singularly interesting when analyzed through the gaze of Sontag in combination of Hegel’s philosophy. The conservative morals that reign over what we understand as pornography, and the cultural moment of Europe since the most progressive moments of the 19th century, describe a fatalist landscape for the future of society and politics. Yet, the learnings from Hegel remain meaningful. In this paper I examine how a post-religious philosophy, aimed long ago by Hegel’s contribution to philosophy, can serve to the understanding of a post-pornographic society: a society that is able to learn from the contributions of Frankfurt’s school with regards to an efficient cultural tissue, and defeat the old religious morals that are inserted in the backbone of politics and philosophy still today.


Keywords


Hegel, post-religion, post-pornography, Žižek Studies, Susan Sontag

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adorno, Theodor W “Drei Studien zu Hegel”. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M. 1971.

Bloch, Ernst (1949) “Avicenna und die aristotelische Linke”. Rütten & Loening.

Brown, Norman O. (1985) “Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History”.

Wesleyan.

Derrida, Jacques (1974) “Glas”. University of Nebraska Press.

Freud, Sigmund; Breuer, Josef (2004) “Studies in Hysteria”. Penguin Classics.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1980) “Hegels Dialektik”. Verlag J.C.B. Mohr, Paul Siebeck, Tübingen,

vermehrte Auflage.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1987) “Phänomenologie des Geistes”. Philip Reclam Jun. Stuttgart.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1977) “The Difference Between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy”.

University of New York Press, Albany.

Hustvedt, Siri (2014) “75 at 75: Siri Hustvedt on Susan Sontag”. Retrieved from

http://92yondemand.org/75-at-75-siri-hustvedt-on-susan-sontag (October 2018).

Kant, Immanuel (2006) “Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View”. Cambridge University

Press.

Lacan, Jacques (1978) “The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis”. Seminars, Book

XI. W.W. Norton & Company.

Laclau, Ernesto et al (2000) “Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues

on the Left”. Verso.

Manzana, Jose (2018) “Hablando del último Fichte” in Manzana: Obras Completas 3. Agirre

and Insausti Eds. Scriptorium Victoriense.

Marcuse, Herbert (1998) “Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud”. Routledge.

Nabokov, Vladimir (1954). Lolita. Vintage.

Réage, Pauline (Dominique Aury) (2013). Ballantine Books eBook Edition.

Sánchez-Cuenca, Ignacio (2016) “La desfachatez intelectual”. Catarata.

Sartre, Jean-Paul (1952) “Saint Genet. Comédian et Martyr”

Sontag, Susan (1962). “The Pornographic Imagination” in Susan Sontag “Against Interpretation”.

Picador 1966.

Sontag, Susan (1985) “Against Interpretation”. Picador.

Žižek, Slavoj (2012) “Less than Nothing” Verso, London-New York.

Zupančič, Alenka (2017) “What is sex?”. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Xabier Insausti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

IJŽS - 2007 & 2016