Abstract
The critical aspect of Slavoj Žižek’s philosophical system is clearly established. It has allowed us to see the ideological backdrop of late capitalism and its political situation. As we move from critique of ideology to theory proper, the desert of Žižekian politics lies in describing the political implications of a politics of subjectivity. Here, I tackle the question of how should we deal with the post-event rupture, when the morning after demands us to present a viable alternative to the previous system. Engaging with Žižek’s latest works, I find a deadlock: responding to the myriad of anti-Trump movements and actions, Žižek warned us of the dangers of false activity and invites us to further study the conditions that allowed the rise of clownish populists in the first place; concerning the European debate about the refugee crisis, he argues for the strengthening of European borders as well as provide an effective bureaucracy to deal with the influx of refugees, avoiding the liberal leftist naïveté of open borders. Such positions do not sit well with the liberal leftist politics that invite us to combat fascism at all costs and demand a compassionate policy towards the refugees. Here, the question of Žižekian politics becomes clear: is it a form of pragmatism (of instituting small reforms to radically change our political life) or a revolutionary theory that depends on the collective subject that introduces the rupture to the status quo? I do not argue that it is one or the other; rather, the two sides provoke a dialectical examination of our political situation, where grand revolutionary projects are constantly haunted by the stigma of failure. Hence, Žižekian politics, as a politics of subjectivity, is a politics of the organization of the collective from the margins that will break the status quo; but, as a politics of militantism, collectivity is complemented by the vigorous study of our present situation to be able to properly confront the political crises of our time.
Keywords
Žižek; politics; populism; pragmatism; revolution; ideology
References
Dean, J. (2016). Crowds and Party. London: Verso.
Johnston, A. (2009). Badiou, Žižek, and Political Transformations: The Cadence of Change. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Laclau, E. (2007). The Populist Reason. London : Verso.
Wells, C. (2014). The Subject of Liberation: Žižek, Politics, Psychoanalysis. New York: Bloomsbury.
Žižek, S. (2009). First as Tragedy then as Farce. London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2009). In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2011). Living in the End Times. London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2012). The Year of Dreaming Dangerously. London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2014). Event. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Žižek, S. (2016). Disparities. New York: Bloomsbury.
Žižek, S. (2017). The Courage of Hopelessness: Chronicles of a Year of Acting Dangerously. London: Allen Lane.
IJŽS - 2007 & 2016