If there is a Greater Ecological Good: On the Way to an Ethico-Politics with Zizek and Sluga

Mark Manolopoulos

Abstract


Is there such a thing as “a/the greater good”? Could it be conceived in radically ecological terms? By critically drawing on skeptical insights presented by Slavoj Žižek and Hans Sluga, the article articulates what I am calling “a/the greater ecological good” as an end and as the ethico-political means to this end. I begin by describing this good as an aim: the survival-flourishing of earthly entities and environs. Its contours and limits are outlined, and various Žižekian objections are addressed. Next, the ethical and political means for this good’s realization are delineated. We are summoned to allow things to survive-thrive (the ethical dimension). But the existing order excessively disallows things from surviving-flourishing, so we are compelled to struggle against it and foster a society of letting-be (the political dimension). The article concludes by proffering an outline of a possible strategy for this political struggle. It would involve (a) the collaborative conception of a blueprint of this envisioned society; (b) popularizing and building mass solidarity around the blueprint; and (c) leveraging this solidarity to, ideally, peacefully implement the blueprint; otherwise, ethico-political violence may be required in order to realize this greater ecological good. 


Keywords


Greater Ecological Good; Žižek; Sluga; Survival-Flourishing; (Political) Struggle

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angus, I., and Butler, S. (2011) Too Many People? Population, Immigration, and the Environmental Crisis, Chicago: Haymarket Books.

Basu, A. M. (2002) “Why does education lead to lower fertility? A critical review of some of the possibilities,” World Development 30.10: 1779-1790.

Crowe, J. (2009) “Explaining natural rights: Ontological freedom and the foundations of political discourse,” New York University Journal of Law and Liberty 4: 70-111.

Heidegger, M. (1966) Discourse on Thinking, trans. J. M. Anderson & E. Hans Freund, New York: Harper and Row.

Heidegger, M. (1996) Being and Time: A Translation of Sein und Zeit, trans. Joan Stambaugh, seventh ed, Albany: State University of New York Press.

Kunkel, B. (2012) “The unbearable lightness of Slavoj Žižek’s communism,” New Statesman, September 27,

http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/culture/2012/09/unbearable-lightness-slavoj-zizeks-communism.

Liddell, H. G., and Scott, R. (1940) A Greek-English Lexicon, Perseus / University of Chicago, http://perseus.uchicago.edu/Reference/LSJ.html.

Liu, X. (1991) “Wuwei (non-action): From Laozi to Hu ainanzi,” Taoist Resources 3: 41-56.

McDaniel, J. (1990) Earth, Sky, Gods and Mortals: Developing an Ecological Spirituality, Mystic: Twenty-Third Publications.

Marx, K. (1845) “Theses on Feuerbach,” Marx/Engels Internet Archive, http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm.

More, T. (2005) Utopia, New York: Barnes & Noble Classics.

Plato. (1974) The Republic, trans. Desmond Lee, second ed., Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Sluga, H. (2014) Politics and the Search for the Common Good, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stone, C. D. (1972) “Should trees have standing? – Toward legal rights for natural objects,” Southern California Law Review 45: 450-501.

Watts, M. (2014) The Philosophy of Heidegger, Abingdon: Routledge.

Žižek, S. (2004) “A plea for ethical violence,” The Bible and Critical Theory 32.1: (02)1-(02)15.

Žižek, S. (2008a) “Nature and its discontents,” SubStance 37.3: 37-72.

Žižek, S. (2008b) Violence: Six Sideways Reflections, London: Profile Books.

Žižek, S. (2012) “Occupy Wall Street: What is to be done next?” The Guardian, April 24, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/apr/24/occupy-wall-street-what-is-to-be-done-next.

Žižek, S. (2013) Demanding the Impossible, ed. Yong-June Park, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Žižek, S., and Milbank, J. (2009) The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic?, ed. Creston Davis, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Zolotin, J. (2017) “In defense of violence,” International Journal of Žižek Studies 11.1: 1-12.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Mark Manolopoulos

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

IJŽS - 2007 & 2016